User correctly spotted that Julie Dupuis shows 114.95$ but actually pays
69.95$ — investigation revealed the legacy COPY (legacy-db container) is a
one-shot snapshot from 2026-05-05 with data through 2026-04-30 and NO
auto-sync. She renegotiated in May (a -50$ discount on service 50999) which
the copy never received. The report was correct vs the copy, but the copy
is ~1 month stale.
Two changes (data-source strategy still pending operator decision —
prod 10.100.80.100:3306 is reachable for a future live/refresh option):
1. data_as_of — the report now reports MAX(invoice.date_orig) from the
copy and the Ops page shows a banner ("Données legacy au 30 avril —
copie figée, N jours"). Turns orange past 7 days so nobody acts on
stale prices unknowingly.
2. recent_expired_discount column — per-address sum of deactivated credit
lines (status=0, price<0) whose actif_until fell in the last 180 days.
Surfaces clients whose discount just lapsed (Julie's RAB24M -15 + RAB_X
-35 expired 2026-03-01), i.e. the prime retention targets whose bill is
about to jump. Shown in amber with a warning icon + tooltip; included in
the CSV.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
User flagged that several listed accounts are inactive (Or Viande Inc,
Denis Henderson). Root cause: I filtered service.status=1 but NOT the
account, so terminated accounts carrying an orphan active service line
slipped through. The legacy billing job (LEGACY-ACCOUNTING-ANALYSIS.md
§6.1) bills only when BOTH service.status=1 AND account.status=1.
Three account-level filters added:
- account.status = 1 → drops terminated accounts. Or Viande Inc is
status=4, terminated 2014 (terminate_date set), but still had a
service.status=1 row. 8602 accounts are status=4 vs 6537 status=1.
- account.group_id = 5 → "Client" per account_group. Drops 6 Prospect,
7 Fournisseur, 8 Relais (network infra, e.g. Denis Henderson's
REL_CHRY_CHARLES tower account), 10 Équipement motorisé.
- customer_id NOT LIKE 'PROPRIO%' → 59 landowner-hosts-our-gear accounts
that live in group 5 but aren't paying customers (Denis Henderson's
other account PROPRIOH_STCHARLES). A genuine same-name customer
(Robert Henderson, ROBEH...) correctly stays.
Residential >90$/mo: 983 → 554 (was inflated ~44% by dead/non-customer
accounts). Commercial: 255 → 240.
Ops page note updated to state "comptes clients actifs uniquement" and
list what's excluded.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Reviewed against docs/archive/LEGACY-ACCOUNTING-ANALYSIS.md (the migration
audit) which surfaced two things to check in the overpriced-internet report:
1. service.payment_recurrence (0=annual, 2=monthly, 5=semestrial...) —
checked whether per-cycle prices needed /N normalization. They do NOT:
verified a semestrial FTTH1500I carries product.price=109.95, identical
to the monthly one (billed 6×109.95 every 6 months). Per §6.1
"prix = quantité × prix_unitaire", product.price is already the monthly
unit price. The original monthly logic was correct — no division. The
SKU-LIKE-'%ANN' /12 special-case stays (true annual plans where price
IS the yearly amount, e.g. FTTH_ANN @ 480$/yr).
2. Promo credits carry an actif_until end date (§10). A discount line whose
actif_until is past no longer reduces today's bill, so counting it
understates what the client actually pays. Now excluded.
NULL-safety: the exclusion needs an explicit `actif_until IS NOT NULL`
guard — without it, `NOT (price<0 AND actif_until>0 AND actif_until<now)`
evaluates to NULL for permanent credits (actif_until NULL), which SQL
treats as not-true and silently DROPS every permanent credit line. That
briefly inflated the residential count to 3330; with the guard it's a
correct 1000 (vs 983 before — +17 addresses whose only sub-90 reason was
a now-expired credit).
Net effect: the report reflects the *current* real monthly Internet bill.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
New Ops report to surface clients whose net monthly Internet bill
exceeds a threshold — for spotting plans that should be revised.
Hub (lib/legacy-reports.js — new module, read-only MariaDB):
- GET /reports/legacy/overpriced-internet (+ .csv variant)
- Queries the legacy gestionclient DB directly via a small mysql2 pool
(reuses cfg.LEGACY_DB_* — same vars as auth.js sync-legacy; added
LEGACY_DB_PASS to the hub .env which was previously unset).
- Grain = delivery (service address), NOT account: a multi-unit
building (account 13166 has 82 doors / 205 services) would otherwise
show a single bogus $2117 line instead of ~45 per door.
- Net monthly Internet = SUM of effective per-line price across
Internet categories (32 fibre, 4 wireless, 23 camping + optional
add-ons 16/17/21), discounts included (products with price<0 are
recurring credits like RAB24M -15$).
- Effective price = service.hijack ? hijack_price : product.price.
- Only recurring lines (product.price_recurr_type=1) — excludes
one-time equipment/install charges.
- Annual plans (SKU LIKE '%ANN', e.g. FTTH_ANN @ 480$/yr) normalized
/12 so they compare correctly against a monthly threshold (was
falsely showing $480 → now $40, drops below 90$).
- Excludes TV (33,34) and téléphonie (9) entirely.
Validated counts at 90$/mo: 983 residential, 297 commercial addresses.
Ops UI:
- src/pages/ReportInternetCherPage.vue — threshold/segment/add-ons
filters, summary cards (count, total monthly, avg, discounts),
sortable+filterable table (client, address, net, gross, discount,
plan detail with full tooltip, contact), CSV download.
- Card on the Rapports hub + route /rapports/internet-cher.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
